IELTS-PTE-GRE Sundar

Some people think that it should be compulsory for people to retake their driving test every five years. What are the advantages and disadvantages of doing this? Nowadays, there is an increase in automobiles on the roads, which aligns with the numerous road accidents. Many argue that instead of taking a single driving test in their life, everyone must undergo the test periodically. What are the positives  and demerits of retaking the driving test? This essay discusses both the positive and negative sides of the repeated driving test in the subsequent passages. On the one hand, the main advantage of the repeated driving test is, we can cut down on many road accidents by educating the motorists about new rules enforced every year. In other words, a person who periodically takes a driving test will be well aware of traffic rules, so there won't be any chance of disobeying regulations. Ultimately, people don't commit any mistakes while driving, which decreases the chances of freque

Government should spend more money on railways than roads. T o what extent  do you agree or disagree ? Transportation has become the basic and compulsory need for people in 21st century. Many of them argue that the authorities should spend more money on railways rather than on roads, I do not quite agree with this view as this isn't the authentic argument. In my opinion, government should invest equal amount of money on both trains and roadways as both of them are important. I am going to shed more lights on this in my write up. Railways are the most advantageous mode of transport. Firstly, it allows more number of people to travel from one place to the other and because of  this the rate of fuel consumption will be less and trains use eco-friendly fuels compared to cars and bikes exhaust emissions which are harmful for the nature. Secondly, railways have all the basic comforts in the compartments where people don't feel cranky, and moreover the passengers can have fun as the w

In some countries, more and more people are becoming interested in finding about the history of the house or building they live in. What are the reasons for this? How can people research this?   Many people probe into the stories of their homes to find the history of the house or building they live in simply because they are curious. Most cities have been in existence since a long period of time and many of its ancient buildings are examples of the stories she (the city) has to narrate to those who’ve forgotten about her.   Many people get into fields related to the study of such stories and buildings whereas, the others research about this out of their inquisitiveness. With cities being developed as concrete jungles, most neighbourhoods and houses look alike thus making people wonder what’s so different or unique about the homes they live in. They may want to know why they spent a million dollars buying an apartment in one specific area because they were getting a similar lo

Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is loss of particular species of plants and animals. Others say that there are more important environmental problems. Discuss both these views and give your opinion. Environment, the most essential term for human life plays a major role in the cycle of nature. These days the environmental conditions are degrading day by day, few of them say, extinction of species in biotic organisms is one of the causes. Others say that there are different environmental problems. I'm going to discuss both of them in my writeup. On one hand, it is stated that, one of the causes for degradation of environment is the extinction of species and also getting endangered. Mostly, the life cycle of an animal or a plant depends on other species, when the species are getting endangered, the cycle is disturbed causing trouble to more organisms. This ensures that the  nature is unbalanced and also causing environmental problems. On the other hand,

  Pollution around the world is becoming a serious problem, do you think this a problem that should be solved internationally or a local level?   The predicament of pollution across the globe is fetching very consequential. I think some major steps must be taken at a regional level so that we could get rid off from this issue regionally and later on globally.   Firstly, pollution is a contamination/addition of pollutant particles into the environment which has a harmful effect on natural habitat and mother nature to a very great extent. It is playing a vital role in the imbalance of the environment, climate change, and global warming. For example, the pollutant particle in the air, water, soil disturbed the natural cycle of the environment and these debris particles is the main reason for the rising temperature in surroundings which ultimately leads to global warming. And also, it has a hurtful impact on human health, some common diseases which are faced by human beings caused by p

Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Changes in environment cannot take place through the individuals, only government or huge companies can bring the difference. I partially agree to the former point since each and every person is responsible for degradation of environment. I believe, co-operation amongst individuals and government can make differences in regards to nature or environment. To commence with, individuals are essential to bring improvements in the environment, minimizing the use of pollution is in the hands of individuals as pollution is a  major aspect of degradation of environment, following eco-friendly lifestyle can be implemented by the individual. In these perspectives, government cannot do anything, it is the quality and quantity of awareness people have! On the other hand, government can improvise the facilities for people which makes them to foll

  Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present.  To what extent do you agree or disagree? Knowing the past is useless since we are living in the present. I partially agree to the former point, as we should know all the aspects that occurred in the past which helps to take good decisions in the present and there are few things which we need not know as they are not helpful in any field. I am going to discuss both the sides of the coin in my writeup. To commence with, the uses of knowing about the past, one of the major perspective of knowing what happened years ago is that, we have to know how the world has evolved, it will let us know the differences in the generations that has been occurring, what cultures and traditions were followed by our elders and are we following the same? It will give us information which is useful for us in following legitimate life. It is advantageous for pupils in the stream of HEC in their secondary schooling. Solicitors, museu