IELTS-PTE-GRE Sundar

The crime rate nowadays is decreasing compared to the past due to advance technology which can prevent and solve crime. Do you agree or disagree?  To commence with, is crime rate dimnishing currently  when compared to the  past? Is crime rate decreasing  due to advance technology? Will technology solve or prevent crime? if yes, how will that happen? In this essay, I am going to shed some light on this topic with my opinion at the end.  I completely agree that crime rate decreased when compared with past because of enrichment in technology. Firstly, in the  past, there were no cctv cameras and no finger print detection mechanisms, but in today's generation, we have cctv cameras almost present everywhere and these acts as disincentive for people to commit crime. Nowadays security is also enchanced by technology. For instance, in past as we need to carry physical money, chances of burglary was high, whereas, today's technology brought many changes and we can have virtual money whi

People usually spend lots of money on marriages/ birthdays and anniversaries, whereas some people argue that these are wastage of money. Discuss both views and give your opinion. Marriages and birthdays are moments of celebration and are universal in nature. Individuals usually spend lavishly on weddings/natal day and relationship ceremonies, though minority of population feel that its total misuse of one’s wealth, I partially agree with the above-mentioned statement and I will pen down both the pros and cons of the topic in the subsequent paragraphs.  One evident merit is that as these events occur once in a lifetime, the individual/person has full privilege to spend his/her money on that auspicious occasion and make it even more memorable by arranging a grand reception or hiring a professional photographer’s team to capture all lovely moments and cherish them later. Secondly, as every near and dear one’s are invited, it facilitates friends and family reunion and bolsters/reinforces

Some people beleive that its best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.  It is widely believed by a majority of individuals that accepting a bad situation and moving on is the optimal solution, while others argue that there is no harm in trying to work for the betterment of it. Surely, one cannot avert the mishappenings in his/her life, but is doing nothing the best way of dealing with things ? In the forthcoming paragraphs, I shall discuss both the views and assert my opinion. To begin with, there are many instances where people perceive that they cannot drastically change their situation and acceptance of such facts will leave them more contented with their lives. According to these people, good or bad situtions are merely 'Act of god' or 'play of fate'. They believe that they have nothing to do when they are destine

Some say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals. Others say that there are more important environmental problems.  Discuss both views and give your opinion.  In this contemporary world where modern civilisation is fueled by blatant exploitation of natural resources, it is conspicuous that planet earth is in grave danger. The loss of natural habitats due to intensive agriculture as well as urbanisation has put the survival of many species of plants and animals under threat. While this is certainly a major concern, is this the most pressing environmental problem that we should deal with? It is also argued by many that there are other issues such as climate change which require more attention. I shall discuss both views in the following paragraphs and cite my opinion at the end.  To start with, increasing populations around the world have led to a drastic reduction in forest perimeters, resulting in a wide scale destruction

Some believe that music is a good way of bringing people of cultures and ages together. To what extent do you agree or disagree with statement ? Every society considers art and music as the core components of their culture. Most people opine that music is a great way to promote cohesion among various cultures and age groups. However, the content and genre of music also play a commendable role. I agree with the statement that music which is soothing and widely acceptable can be used for promoting harmony.  In these highly stressful times, music can be sought as a way to bring people together and with various platforms of digital media, music lovers are able to break barriers and unite enthusiastically. People join hands for several charitable causes on grounds of their common liking for music. For example, the sad demise of chester bennington, the lead singer of the band linkin park bought together various fan communities. Social media was swarmed with tributaries and public gatherings

Nowadays celebrities are more known for their glamour and wealth than for their achievement, and this sets a bad example to young people.To what extent do you agree or disagree? It is a widely beleived fact a major percentange of celebrities these days are merely highlighted for their glamour and wealth rather than their professional acheivements and talents. This leads to arguments that flaunting luxurious lifestyles will set negative examples on young minds. Although I agree with the fact that, famous personalities influence their audience, I also beleive that they cannot be held responsible for their behaviour and there are there are other personalities who are solely broadcasted for their work. In the following stanzas i will cite reasons for the same.  With recent advancements in technology, there has been a drastic boom in publicity platforms and the public interaction with their stars has become very effortless. People's interest in private lifes of celebrities has grown and

Some people think that intelligence is innate, while others think we can improve our intelligence through learning. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. Is intelligence inborn or is it nurtured through learning? On the one hand, several people believe that intelligence is inherent for infants, while, on the other hand, some individuals trust that learning and acquiring knowledge at schools is immensely essential to arouse one’s brainpower. In my subsequent paragraphs, I will elucidate both these schools of thought along with my viewpoint at the end. To commence with, intelligence is certainly innate, and the prime reason for this kind of functioning is that if the parents are clever and canny, then in all likelihood, there is a mammoth probability of children acquiring their mother or father genes which lead them to possess a higher level intelligent quotient. For instance, the IQ level of one of the most celebrated physicists, Albert Einstein, was on sky-high. Similarly, his offs